🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios launched a new playlist called Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option resembles the regular Breakthrough setup but features several notable adjustments:

• Every squad has just 8 real players, with the rest filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities done by real players grant complete experience points, while bot actions provide lower rewards.
• Only two maps are available: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Elements like Player tags, accolades, and career stat updates have been turned off.

So essentially, the playlist delivers on its title: it offers a laid-back take of Breakthrough. On the surface, you might think it's a good idea, since it gives more options for players looking for different methods to have fun with the title. However, if video games has shown one thing, it is that you can't please everyone. In other words, many Battlefield 6 fans are mad.

Player Reactions: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the errors of your competitors," reads one reply to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," comments another. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user remarks, "It's unclear where we are headed with this game," while someone else lists all the issues they consider to be problematic in the game: "Resolve glitches, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, for every complaint, some gamers sharing how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to warm up, human participants prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," says a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are gamers who actually go outside and can't play this title 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," states a different comment. A response on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," while another praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Criticisms and Player Input

All that said, players have valid points to criticize Casual Breakthrough. Some users have pointed out that it could increase queue times even longer for other modes because of the large amount of options in the game already. Similarly, some areas already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems a little backwards that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of real players, even though it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Finally, a major grievances is that a previous feature was promised to provide full XP, including AI matches, but that got canned when they attempted to eliminate XP farming from the mode. So Casual Breakthrough feels like the community compromising in the middle, according to a Reddit comment. A different user labels this addition as the developers "making a mistake so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Occur?

If Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something to date with Battlefield 6, it is that they're paying attention and acting on player input. Tasks that were overly hard got fixed rapidly, just like the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, should analytics shows this recent mode is underperforming to their expectations, they won't be shy to make further modifications.