🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where African descendants are remunerated to talk to predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in October in the UK, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has developed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the method the celebration is celebrated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels empowered to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a whole.

In the US, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to erase African American heritage and experience from the records is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration illustrates how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an framework that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed through the year (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.