🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

Based on recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now the government is shut down because political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I can name multiple clients who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When including these expenses versus our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.